FlatMapper

[Brian Goetz]

Is mapInto better than flattenInto?  Still trivial to change at this point.

On 2/21/2013 11:33 AM, Kevin Bourrillion wrote:
> Tardy, but:  the Googlers I ran this by all felt just fine with
> "mapInto".  Sure, you can map /multiple, /but that fact just didn't seem
> overly necessary to force into the name.
>
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Joe Bowbeer <joe.bowbeer at gmail.com
> <mailto:joe.bowbeer at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     flattenInto gets my vote
>
>     On Feb 17, 2013 11:09 AM, "Remi Forax" <forax at univ-mlv.fr
>     <mailto:forax at univ-mlv.fr>> wrote:
>
>         On 02/17/2013 08:07 PM, Brian Goetz wrote:
>
>             flattenInto seems the best so far.
>
>
>         +1
>
>         Rémi
>
>
>             On 2/17/2013 9:36 AM, Tim Peierls wrote:
>
>                 On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Remi Forax
>                 <forax at univ-mlv.fr <mailto:forax at univ-mlv.fr>
>                 <mailto:forax at univ-mlv.fr <mailto:forax at univ-mlv.fr>>>
>                 wrote:
>
>                      mapAndFlattenInto is a little to verbose for me,
>                 mapAndFlat ?
>
>
>                 No, has to be a verb.
>
>                 I'd still understand flattenInto, leaving the mapping
>                 part to be implied
>                 by the type name.
>
>                 --tim
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Kevin Bourrillion | Java Librarian | Google, Inc. |kevinb at google.com
> <mailto:kevinb at google.com>