mappedTo -> join?

[Tim Peierls]

toMap works for me.

join is already too overloaded.

On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Remi Forax <forax at univ-mlv.fr> wrote:

> On 01/08/2013 06:12 PM, Brian Goetz wrote:
>
>> One of the reducers we've got takes a Stream<T> and a function T->U and
>> creates a Map<T,U>.  Currently we call this "mappedTo".  Should this be
>> called "join" instead?  Or mapJoin?
>>
>>   Map<Person, Integer> map = people.reduce(mappedTo(Person:**:getAge)));
>> vs
>>   Map<Person, Integer> map = people.reduce(join(Person::**getAge)));
>>   Map<Person, Integer> map = people.reduce(mapJoin(Person::**getAge)));
>>
>
> or just toMap,
> Map<Person, Integer> map = people.reduce(Reducer.toMap(**
> Person::getAge)));
>
> Rémi
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/lambda-libs-spec-experts/attachments/20130108/8374e380/attachment.html