mappedTo -> join?

[Raab, Donald]

+1


toMap works for me.

join is already too overloaded.
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Remi Forax <forax at univ-mlv.fr<mailto:forax at univ-mlv.fr>> wrote:
On 01/08/2013 06:12 PM, Brian Goetz wrote:
One of the reducers we've got takes a Stream<T> and a function T->U and creates a Map<T,U>.  Currently we call this "mappedTo".  Should this be called "join" instead?  Or mapJoin?

  Map<Person, Integer> map = people.reduce(mappedTo(Person::getAge)));
vs
  Map<Person, Integer> map = people.reduce(join(Person::getAge)));
  Map<Person, Integer> map = people.reduce(mapJoin(Person::getAge)));

or just toMap,
Map<Person, Integer> map = people.reduce(Reducer.toMap(Person::getAge)));

Rémi

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/lambda-libs-spec-experts/attachments/20130108/5b83e984/attachment.html