Function type naming conventions

[Tim Peierls]

On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Dan Smith <daniel.smith at oracle.com> wrote:

> Let me propose a slightly different convention: if the base type is
> parameterized in both its parameters and return, then the "To" prefix is
> mandatory.  If not, "To" is not used.
>

So:

    Function<Foo, Bar>  // Foo -> Bar
    ToIntFunction<Foo>  // Foo -> int
    Supplier<Bar> // () -> Bar
    IntSupplier   // () -> int

Right?

Works for me.

--tim
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/lambda-libs-spec-experts/attachments/20130124/400a821e/attachment.html