Function type naming conventions

[Paul Sandoz]

On Jan 29, 2013, at 5:48 PM, Kevin Bourrillion <kevinb at google.com> wrote:

> Does anyone have a complete and current taxonomy of where exactly we've
> ended up with all this (leaving out all the history of how we got here)?

Does the following suffice?

http://hg.openjdk.java.net/lambda/lambda/jdk/file/5d4167b7bf8c/src/share/classes/java/util/function/package-info.java

Paul.

> 
> 
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Tim Peierls <tim at peierls.net> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Joe Bowbeer <joe.bowbeer at gmail.com>wrote:
>> 
>>> +1 ObjIntBlock (or a more descriptive "Block" name if one is selected)
>>> 
>> 
>> Agreed.
>> 
>> Works well in conjunction with Dan Smith's suggestion ('if the base type
>> is parameterized in both its parameters and return, then the "To" prefix is
>> mandatory.  If not, "To" is not used.'), omitting To and Bi where they
>> aren't needed.
>> 
>> --tim
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Kevin Bourrillion | Java Librarian | Google, Inc. | kevinb at google.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/lambda-libs-spec-experts/attachments/20130129/8c79077c/attachment.html