Forms for reduce() -- part 1

Tim Peierls tim at peierls.net
Fri Dec 14 13:03:10 PST 2012


On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Brian Goetz <brian.goetz at oracle.com> wrote:

> So, the question remains -- is the word "mutable" (or some other way of
>>> saying that) a helpful guide about what is being done here, or pedantic
>>> noise that will irritate the users?  (Note that I think we should care much
>>> less how it makes people feel when *writing* code than how it helps
>>> comprehension when *reading* code.)
>>
>>
I don't think it's noise. It's going to be less common to come across
"mutable" forms in practice, since they'll be harder to work with
and will typically have to be wrapped in something more friendly. (That's
my prediction, anyway.) So I think long descriptive names are fine here,
like reduceThroughSideEffects or reduceHereBeDragons.

--tim


More information about the lambda-libs-spec-observers mailing list