Forms for reduce() -- part 1
Tim Peierls
tim at peierls.net
Fri Dec 14 14:03:59 PST 2012
[Oops, failed to Reply-All]
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Brian Goetz <brian.goetz at oracle.com> wrote:
> I thought was using "so" to mean "I agree with your conclusion, but not
> your assumption, but here's an alternate reasoning that supports your
> conclusion anyway" :)
>
That's nearly exactly how I read it!
> I think "mutableReduce" is a fair balance between a small number of extra
> characters and some extra meaning.
>
It's nice if they sort near each other in javadocs, so "reduce<modifier>"
is better than "<modifier>Reduce".
--tim
More information about the lambda-libs-spec-observers
mailing list