Forms for reduce() -- part 1

Tim Peierls tim at peierls.net
Fri Dec 14 14:03:59 PST 2012


[Oops, failed to Reply-All]

On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Brian Goetz <brian.goetz at oracle.com> wrote:

> I thought was using "so" to mean "I agree with your conclusion, but not
> your assumption, but here's an alternate reasoning that supports your
> conclusion anyway" :)
>

That's nearly exactly how I read it!



> I think "mutableReduce" is a fair balance between a small number of extra
> characters and some extra meaning.
>

It's nice if they sort near each other in javadocs, so "reduce<modifier>"
is better than "<modifier>Reduce".

--tim


More information about the lambda-libs-spec-observers mailing list