ConcurrentHashMap/ConcurrentMap/Map.compute

[Doug Lea]

On 12/14/12 19:47, Brian Goetz wrote:

>> (no MapStreams) I'm left with the usual choices of how
>> to name and/or parameterize them. Probably:
>>     forEach{Key,Value,Entry,<mapping>}Sequentially /
>> forEach{...}InParallel
>>     reduce{...}Sequentially / reduce{...}InParallel
>>     search{...}Sequentially / search{...}InParallel
>
> Seems reasonable.  I'd suggest leaving off Sequentially but you'll just ignore
> that :)
>

The main reason is caution wrt future APIs by not using the
prime real estate of plain "forEach". And it seems OK to
do this here in CHM, since it is designed mainly for
concurrency+parallelism anyway, so making the choice very
explicit is more defensible than elsewhere.

-Doug