"-implicit:none" flag is ignored

[Jonathan Gibbons]

If this is the "-implicit:none" flag in JDK javac, and if you think it 
is not working,
you should have this discussion on compiler-dev at openjdk.java.net.

-- Jon


On 08/08/2013 07:15 AM, José Cornado wrote:
> The other point of info is:
>
>
> When "-implicit:none" used to work the implicit class was located in a
> different folder from the one where the class being generated. It is
> failing when the implicit class resides in the same folder as the injected
> class.
>
> Thanks a lot in advance!!!
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:26 PM, José Cornado <jose.cornado at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The end of the story:
>>
>> The recently created class does not have a corresponding source file. This
>> causes the task run to fail.
>>
>> There is an obvious work-around but it would reduce the task to a crawl.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:56 PM, José Cornado <jose.cornado at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>> I am running into the following problem in the latest 1.6 and 1.7
>>> (1.7.0_25-b15):
>>>
>>> I have a jvm in the background that uses the built-in compiler: it builds
>>> some code dynamically and it uses the "-implicit:none" flag to speed up the
>>> task.
>>>
>>> For a relatively long time it worked. Now, it seems to fail.
>>>
>>> The only difference is that now I am importing a class already created
>>> using a previous call to this builder.
>>>
>>> The verbose runs of the task show the correct paths being included. A
>>> listing of the bin dirs shows *.class are in place.
>>>
>>> Has anybody seen this?
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot!!!
>>>
>>> --
>>> José Cornado
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> home: http://www.efekctive.com
>>> blog:   http://blogging.efekctive.com
>>> ----------------------
>>>
>>> Everything has been said before, but since nobody listens we have to keep
>>> going back and beginning all over again.
>>>
>>> Andre Gide
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> José Cornado
>>
>> --
>>
>> home: http://www.efekctive.com
>> blog:   http://blogging.efekctive.com
>> ----------------------
>>
>> Everything has been said before, but since nobody listens we have to keep
>> going back and beginning all over again.
>>
>> Andre Gide
>>
>
>