Longjumps considered inexpensive...until they aren't

Wed Jun 4 10:07:51 PDT 2008

That's still an open question...potentially about half of it. My current 
"best path" for improving the situation is static inspection of the code 
to determine which OOB bits are actually needed and only 
instantiating/initializing those. I'll try to gather more of this 
information today, since I'm in LogCompilation land lately.

John Rose wrote:
> Annotations on call sites might let you put all the static information 
> aside.  How much of that stuff is static or could be made static?  -- John
> 
> On Jun 4, 2008, at 9:25 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
> 
>> Exploration continues. I'm still looking for the magic bullet that will 
>>
>> eliminate our need for artificial frames.
>>
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mlvm-dev mailing list
> mlvm-dev at openjdk.java.net
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev