Trying to work newer indy into JRuby

[Rémi Forax]

Charles Oliver Nutter a écrit :
> Rémi Forax wrote:
>   
>> Ok, I've forget to update that code when the encoding of invokedynamic 
>> bytecode change.
>> I haven't applied your patch because I think it is simpler to use a 
>> specific case for INVOKEDYNAMIC.
>>     
>
> No problem...when you've applied your change let me know and I'll update.
>
> I don't think there's going to be any more changes at the bytecode 
> level, right? Can we get this pushed into an ASM release soon?
>   
I've forget to say that the invokedynamic branch of ASM already contains 
the fix.

> - Charlie
>   
Rémi