Trying to work newer indy into JRuby

[Charles Oliver Nutter]

Rémi Forax wrote:
> Charles Oliver Nutter a écrit :
>> Rémi Forax wrote:
>>   
>>> Ok, I've forget to update that code when the encoding of invokedynamic 
>>> bytecode change.
>>> I haven't applied your patch because I think it is simpler to use a 
>>> specific case for INVOKEDYNAMIC.
>>>     
>> No problem...when you've applied your change let me know and I'll update.
>>
>> I don't think there's going to be any more changes at the bytecode 
>> level, right? Can we get this pushed into an ASM release soon?
>>   
> I've forget to say that the invokedynamic branch of ASM already contains 
> the fix.

Great, thanks! Now if we can get it into a release, we can ship it.

- Charlie