Fwd: [asm] toward ASM 4.0

[Rémi Forax]

There is a fix available in the trunk of ASM.
Thanks Ducan.

Rémi

On 08/18/2011 11:20 AM, MacGregor, Duncan (GE Energy) wrote:
>
> It showed up for me in generating classes within compilation tests, 
> which were being loaded by a test runner. I doubt it would show up 
> normally.
>
> *From:*mlvm-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net 
> [mailto:mlvm-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net] *On Behalf Of *Mark Roos
> *Sent:* 17 August 2011 21:47
> *To:* Da Vinci Machine Project
> *Subject:* RE: Fwd: [asm] toward ASM 4.0
>
> Thanks Duncan,
>
> you mentioned
>
> One problem I have found is that in changing 
> ClassWriter.getCommonSuperClass() to not
>
> call initialisation code they've limited it to classes loaded by the 
> bootstrap ClassLoader.
>
> How did this show up in your code?  Did you have an explicit call or 
> was it incidental to just creating classes?
> I think I am ok for now as I switched to using the standard class 
> loader but who know where we will end up.
>
> thanks
>
> mark
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mlvm-dev mailing list
> mlvm-dev at openjdk.java.net
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/mlvm-dev/attachments/20110818/ea9acd6d/attachment-0001.html