hg: mlvm/mlvm/hotspot: rebase to jdk7-b132 in bsd-port

[Stephen Bannasch]

At 7:52 PM -0700 3/24/11, John Rose wrote:
>On Mar 24, 2011, at 11:24 AM, Stephen Bannasch wrote:
>
>> At 2:36 AM -0700 3/23/11, John Rose wrote:
>>> With the renaming going on, the code is changing rapidly.  But I think we are converging. Please let me know what happens with the next build.
>>
>> Today the build completes fine but I still only get one java/lang/invoke test passing.
>>
>> FAILED: java/lang/invoke/6987555/Test6987555.java
>> FAILED: java/lang/invoke/6991596/Test6991596.java
>> Passed: java/lang/invoke/ClassValueTest.java
>> FAILED: java/lang/invoke/InvokeDynamicPrintArgs.java
>> FAILED: java/lang/invoke/InvokeGenericTest.java
>> FAILED: java/lang/invoke/JavaDocExamplesTest.java
>> FAILED: java/lang/invoke/MethodHandlesTest.java
>> FAILED: java/lang/invoke/MethodTypeTest.java
>> Test results: passed: 1; failed: 7
>>
>> Some folks have been interested in having me generate an updated mlvm build.
>>
>> I've been waiting for these tests to pass before uploading a new build.
>>
>> In effect I am using passing the java/lang/invoke tests as a proxy for determining whether a build is worth sharing.  Is this too strict a proxy?
>
>No, that's not too strict.  It is the test I use for pushing a patch to mlvm.  There's something different about yourbuild and mine.

If you use a build script can you post a copy to gist or some other location.

I use update.sh which is one of the documents in this gist: https://gist.github.com/243072