Proposal for Property Accessors

[Noctarius]

Am 06.01.2013 00:44, schrieb John Rose:
> On Jan 5, 2013, at 12:03 PM, Remi Forax wrote:
> 
>> I think I prefer a more general mechanism that ask javac to 
>> replace all access to fields (or methods) for a given class,
>> insert an invokedynamic instead and let you specifies the
>> bootstrap method in Java code.
>> 
>> With that, you have properties, proxy, interceptor, AOP, and
>> with a little effort method_not_found.
> 
> I have a pet name for that, Ninja = "Ninja Is Not Java
> Anymore".
> 
> The Scala people have a similar project to virtualize the
> language, and it is likely IMO to be a useful exercise, at
> least in their world.  By virtualizing most or all language
> constructs, you can experiment with DSLs at very low cost.
> 

I don't want to go that far but it seems that there are different
opinions around that :-)

> — John
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev
> mailing list mlvm-dev at openjdk.java.net 
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
>