Code generation patches for fuzzer (feedback requested)

[Hannes Wallnoefer]

Sorry if this was asked before, but did you sign the OpenJDK contributor 
agreement? Would you mind doing so?

http://openjdk.java.net/contribute/

That is required to adopt your patches.

Thanks,
Hannes

Am 2013-10-15 16:59, schrieb André Bargull:
> (Your answer was only sent to the mailing list and I'm using digest 
> mode, that means I get your responses with delay... )
>
> Sure, I understand the scheduling issues. If the changes are too risky 
> or if there isn't even enough time to perform risk evaluation, they 
> won't make it for JDK8. But posting the patches won't hurt, will it? :-)
>
> - André
>
>
>> As we are approaching towards jdk8 end game, it is better to avoid
>> sweeping changes at the last minute.
>>
>> I think we can definitely consider these changes for post jdk8 (8 update
>> perhaps..).
>>
>> PS. As you know, not all your previous 'fuzzer' issues have been fixed
>> for jdk8 - again due to time constraints.
>>
>> Thanks for reporting,
>> -Sundar