Code generation patches for fuzzer (feedback requested)

[André Bargull]

Already done --> 
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/community/oca-486395.html#b  :-D


On 10/15/2013 5:12 PM, Hannes Wallnoefer wrote:
> Sorry if this was asked before, but did you sign the OpenJDK 
> contributor agreement? Would you mind doing so?
>
> http://openjdk.java.net/contribute/
>
> That is required to adopt your patches.
>
> Thanks,
> Hannes
>
> Am 2013-10-15 16:59, schrieb André Bargull:
>> (Your answer was only sent to the mailing list and I'm using digest 
>> mode, that means I get your responses with delay... )
>>
>> Sure, I understand the scheduling issues. If the changes are too 
>> risky or if there isn't even enough time to perform risk evaluation, 
>> they won't make it for JDK8. But posting the patches won't hurt, will 
>> it? :-)
>>
>> - André
>>
>>
>>> As we are approaching towards jdk8 end game, it is better to avoid
>>> sweeping changes at the last minute.
>>>
>>> I think we can definitely consider these changes for post jdk8 (8 
>>> update
>>> perhaps..).
>>>
>>> PS. As you know, not all your previous 'fuzzer' issues have been fixed
>>> for jdk8 - again due to time constraints.
>>>
>>> Thanks for reporting,
>>> -Sundar
>
>