Bug report: AtomicInteger is converted to a Number when returned from function

[A. Sundararajan]

Hi,

1) http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8u/releases/8u40.html

2) Yes. You're testing with the correct nashorn repo (jdk8u-dev/nashorn).

-Sundar

On Wednesday 27 August 2014 10:28 AM, Tal Liron wrote:
> OK, so my goal is for my application to be stable on 8u40.
>
> 1) When is 8u40 scheduled to be released?
> 2) Will 8u-dev eventually be 8u40? Am I doing the correct thing by 
> testing against 8u-dev?
>
> On 08/27/2014 12:35 PM, A. Sundararajan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> * Latest released 8 update is 8u20. Available @ 
>> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jdk8-downloads-2133151.html. 
>>
>>
>> * Next 8 update "early access" binary can be downloaded @ 
>> https://jdk8.java.net/download.html
>>
>> * 8u-dev nashorn development repository is @ 
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/nashorn
>>
>> If you are using the above nashorn repo, then you're testing the 
>> latest nashorn code on the 8 update series.
>>
>> Please send us bug reports - either by posting in the mailing list or 
>> by filing bug reports.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Sundar
>>
>> On Wednesday 27 August 2014 09:59 AM, Tal Liron wrote:
>>> I'm a bit confused as to 8u-dev:
>>>
>>> 1) When is the next JDK8 release, and what will be its version? (8u 
>>> ...?)
>>> 2) Am I doing the right thing by testing 8u-dev if I want my 
>>> application to work well with the next JDK8 release?
>>>
>>> As it stands, 8u20 has too many issues, making it impossible for me 
>>> to deploy on it. But I want my application to be ready for the next 
>>> general release of JDK8. (Of course, I also want to help in 
>>> improving Nashorn by reporting bugs)
>>>
>>> On 08/27/2014 11:53 AM, A. Sundararajan wrote:
>>>> Yes, this is a bug with 8u-dev and 9-dev - but not reproduced with 
>>>> 8u20 binary. With 8u-dev and 9-dev, the scripts runs fine with 
>>>> --optimistic-types set to false.
>>
>