Review request for JDK-8059844

[Marcus Lagergren]

+1. Sad that the code base diversification between 8 and 9 begins now … 

/M

On 20 Oct 2014, at 14:48, Attila Szegedi <attila.szegedi at oracle.com> wrote:

> Folks,
> 
> I had to make minor adjustments for this patch when backporting it to 8. The reason is that constructors for FunctionNode differ in 9 and 8 after JDK-8012518 (bottom up parser), which is a 9-only change (and so the divergence begins…)
> 
> A difference between the 9 and 8 codebase is available at <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~attila/8059844/webrev-8-backport/index.html>. Could you please review it? It's only a change in the modified constructors' invocations.
> 
> Thanks,
>  Attila.
> 
> On Oct 17, 2014, at 2:23 PM, Hannes Wallnoefer <hannes.wallnoefer at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
>> +1 for webrev.02. Good work keeping recompilation overhead at reasonable levels!
>> 
>> Hannes
>> 
>> Am 2014-10-07 um 13:52 schrieb Attila Szegedi:
>>> Please review JDK-8059844 at <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~attila/8059844/webrev.00> for <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8059844>
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>>  Attila.
>> 
>