SocketPermission's implies() interesting behavior

[Chris Hegarty]

On 07/ 5/11 10:10 AM, Charles Lee wrote:
> On 04/08/2011 04:47 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>> On 04/ 7/11 04:53 PM, Neil Richards wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 10:43 +0000, Neil Richards wrote:
>>>> On 11 March 2011 14:39, Chris Hegarty<chris.hegarty at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>> As Michael (cc'ed) mentioned in an earlier mail, he is going to be
>>>>> making
>>>>> some significant changes in this area in the next week or two. He will
>>>>> include this change with the other one, so their impact can be
>>>>> considered
>>>>> together, if that is ok?
>>>>
>>>> That's fine by me, so long as the changeset that addresses this
>>>> problem is linked back to this conversation (so that one can track the
>>>> progress of the fix for this problem into the component, then master
>>>> repository).
>>>
>>> Can you tell me if the changes headlined above have yet been made to the
>>> code (and point me to the URL of the change) ?
>>
>> These changes have not yet been integrated. I believe Michael will be
>> pushing them soon.
>>
>> -Chris.
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Neil
>>>
> Hi Chris,
>
> I have tested this issue with latest openjdk7 build (b147). The
> "blabla"[1] test case still fails. Is it ok if I am going to give a
> patch according the openjdk 8 code base?

I apologize for this. By the time the other changes were ready for 
SocketPermission we were past the lock down period for JDK7. I'll 
proceed with getting the changes we agreed upon [1] into JDK8.

-Chris.

[1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/7021280/webrev.01/webrev/

>
> [1] http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=7021280
>