SocketPermission's implies() interesting behavior

[Charles Lee]

On 07/12/2011 07:03 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>
>
> On 07/ 5/11 10:10 AM, Charles Lee wrote:
>> On 04/08/2011 04:47 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>>> On 04/ 7/11 04:53 PM, Neil Richards wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 10:43 +0000, Neil Richards wrote:
>>>>> On 11 March 2011 14:39, Chris Hegarty<chris.hegarty at oracle.com> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> As Michael (cc'ed) mentioned in an earlier mail, he is going to be
>>>>>> making
>>>>>> some significant changes in this area in the next week or two. He 
>>>>>> will
>>>>>> include this change with the other one, so their impact can be
>>>>>> considered
>>>>>> together, if that is ok?
>>>>>
>>>>> That's fine by me, so long as the changeset that addresses this
>>>>> problem is linked back to this conversation (so that one can track 
>>>>> the
>>>>> progress of the fix for this problem into the component, then master
>>>>> repository).
>>>>
>>>> Can you tell me if the changes headlined above have yet been made 
>>>> to the
>>>> code (and point me to the URL of the change) ?
>>>
>>> These changes have not yet been integrated. I believe Michael will be
>>> pushing them soon.
>>>
>>> -Chris.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Neil
>>>>
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> I have tested this issue with latest openjdk7 build (b147). The
>> "blabla"[1] test case still fails. Is it ok if I am going to give a
>> patch according the openjdk 8 code base?
>
> I apologize for this. By the time the other changes were ready for 
> SocketPermission we were past the lock down period for JDK7. I'll 
> proceed with getting the changes we agreed upon [1] into JDK8.
>
> -Chris.
>
> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/7021280/webrev.01/webrev/
>
>>
>> [1] http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=7021280
>>
No problem. Thank you very much, Chris.

-- 
Yours Charles