RFR[8237890]: 'DatagramPacket::getSocketAddress doesn't specify what happens if address or port are not set'

[Patrick Concannon]

Hi Chris,

Thanks for that.

I've added the new testcases as requested, and you can find them in the 
new webrev below.

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pconcannon/8237890/webrevs/webrev.02/


Kind regards,

Patrick

On 15/04/2020 16:54, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>
>> On 15 Apr 2020, at 16:40, Patrick Concannon <patrick.concannon at oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>
>> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pconcannon/8237890/webrevs/webrev.01/
>>
> I added myself as reviewer on the CSR.
>
> The changes mainly look good. Can you please add, or amend an existing, test for the newly specified default address and port values.
>
> -Chris.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/attachments/20200416/289291ef/attachment.htm>