RFR[8237890]: 'DatagramPacket::getSocketAddress doesn't specify what happens if address or port are not set'

[Daniel Fuchs]

Thanks Patrick.

Looks good me.

best regards,

-- daniel

On 16/04/2020 14:39, Patrick Concannon wrote:
> Hi Chris,
> 
> Thanks for that.
> 
> I've added the new testcases as requested, and you can find them in the 
> new webrev below.
> 
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pconcannon/8237890/webrevs/webrev.02/
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Patrick
> 
> On 15/04/2020 16:54, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>>> On 15 Apr 2020, at 16:40, Patrick Concannon<patrick.concannon at oracle.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> webrev:http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pconcannon/8237890/webrevs/webrev.01/
>>>
>> I added myself as reviewer on the CSR.
>>
>> The changes mainly look good. Can you please add, or amend an existing, test for the newly specified default address and port values.
>>
>> -Chris.
>>