RFR: 8357268: Use JavaNioAccess.getBufferAddress rather than DirectBuffer.address() [v10]
Alan Bateman
alanb at openjdk.org
Tue May 27 12:46:57 UTC 2025
On Tue, 27 May 2025 11:50:14 GMT, Per Minborg <pminborg at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> This PR proposes to use `JavaNioAccess::getBufferAdress` rather than `DirectBuffer::address` so that `Buffer` instances backed by MemorySegment instances can be used in classes that were not covered by https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/25321
>>
>> This PR passes tier1, tier2, and tier3 tests on multiple platforms and configurations.
>
> Per Minborg has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 13 additional commits since the last revision:
>
> - Merge branch 'master' into jdk-segment-access
> - Revert copyright year
> - Revoke changes in WAFCI
> - Address comments
> - Fix copyright year
> - Update after comments
> - Update after comments
> - Add tests
> - Clean up
> - Revoke changes in classes that is always using DirectBuffer
> - ... and 3 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/5abc863c...1eb284df
Marked as reviewed by alanb (Reviewer).
-------------
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25324#pullrequestreview-2870926691
More information about the net-dev
mailing list