RFR: 8357268: Use JavaNioAccess.getBufferAddress rather than DirectBuffer.address() [v10]

[Per Minborg]

On Tue, 27 May 2025 11:50:14 GMT, Per Minborg <pminborg at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This PR proposes to use  `JavaNioAccess::getBufferAdress` rather than `DirectBuffer::address` so that `Buffer` instances backed by MemorySegment instances can be used in classes that were not covered by https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/25321
>> 
>> This PR passes tier1, tier2, and tier3 tests on multiple platforms and configurations.
>
> Per Minborg has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 13 additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Merge branch 'master' into jdk-segment-access
>  - Revert copyright year
>  - Revoke changes in WAFCI
>  - Address comments
>  - Fix copyright year
>  - Update after comments
>  - Update after comments
>  - Add tests
>  - Clean up
>  - Revoke changes in classes that is always using DirectBuffer
>  - ... and 3 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/ca90399f...1eb284df

I am reverting to 1 reviewer, as we have removed the asynchronous Windows class.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25324#issuecomment-2912390902