JavaFX for the Enterprise - Working Group

[Peter Pilgrim]

Richard Bair gave a presentation on rich text components vis-a-vis
TextPane and TextFlow at JavaOne

Supporting styles, bidirectional flow, Arabic /Hebrew maybe Chinese?,
proper text wrapping and flowing around a defined area.

So in affect we should be all able to write IDE in JavaFX

If Kim is lurking about still on this list, he will definite
understand the verbosity  of the old Swing style text document Apis ,
I expect better with the new FX text Apis in Fx8

Sent from my iPhone 4S

On 17 Oct 2012, at 16:34, Mark Claassen <markclaassenx at gmail.com> wrote:

> I am not as concerned in the "bridge" as I am in the framework.  Although I
> agree a bridge is necessary, and would like it to work well.
>
> My comment is more about being on a track to where someone could
> (eventually) build Netbeans from scratch using only JavaFX.  The customized
> window behavior, the Drag and Drop, the little tooltip-like popup windows
> used in the tree renderers to show the text that is not visible because of
> the visible bounds of the tree, ... all of it.
>
> What about the document model?  The Swing javax.swing.text.Document
> interface is pretty powerful.  The way it seems implemented in JavaFX does
> not seem nearly as powerful, or as pluggable.
>
> Mark
>
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Mario Torre <
> neugens.limasoftware at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> """
>> This thread is interesting. I've seen at J1 some tools using JavaFX
>> with the SWT bridge. The Swing one will also work equally well. We
>> also have (we need to put some love to make it work on 2.2
>> """
>>
>> Somehow this got cut, I meant:
>>
>> This thread is interesting. I've seen at J1 some tools using JavaFX
>> with the SWT bridge. The Swing one will also work equally well. We
>> also have (we need to put some love to make it work on 2.2) that
>> can be used to embed Swing on top of JavaFX (the other way around).
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Mario
>>
>> 2012/10/17 Mario Torre <neugens.limasoftware at gmail.com>:
>>> 2012/10/17 Mark Claassen <markclaassenx at gmail.com>:
>>>> I joined this list a few days ago because I wanted to start contributing
>>>> So far, I am not sure it is quite where I should be.  I would like to
>>>> discuss more about the components (table, list boxes, ...).  I am not
>>>> exactly sure where to do that.
>>>
>>> You just unfortunately ended up subscribing to this list in the middle
>>> of a storm :)
>>>
>>> But this list has been used in the past to discuss components and
>>> details of the implementation, so this is definitely the right place
>>> to start discussing those things.
>>>
>>> @Richard: Perhaps it would be more fun to simply have a list dedicated
>>> to flaming Oracle for supporting HTML 5 rather than JavaFX :)
>>>
>>>> However, I will add here that I started (a very short-lived) thread on
>> the
>>>> netbeans user list along these lines.  Basically what I was saying was
>> that
>>>> Netbeans is a wonderful UI built on Swing.  Could this same project be
>> done
>>>> in JavaFX?  Maybe not yet, but could it be in the future?  It seems like
>>>> the JavaFX team could get a lot of advice and requirements from the
>>>> netbeans team.
>>>>
>>>> http://forums.netbeans.org/topic51717.html
>>>
>>> This thread is interesting. I've seen at J1 some tools using JavaFX
>>> with the SWT bridge. The Swing one will also work equally well. We
>>> also have (we need to put some love to make it work on 2.2
>>>
>>> The big trouble is #2, this will only work if:
>>>
>>> 1. Netbeans can ship JavaFX
>>> 2. JavaFX is included in any major OpenJDK/JDK releases (that means,
>>> including distribution related IcedTea builds).
>>>
>>> For both options, JavaFX needs to be fully Open Sourced, or even
>>> NetBeans will fall back into non free bits, so I agree with them.
>>>
>>>> Some of the main data structures, like the ObservableList, make me
>> cringe.
>>>> I created a similar structure 10 years ago and have since learned the
>> error
>>>> of my ways.  Granted, the JavaFX team has a lot more resources and
>>>> experience than I did all those years ago, but from my point of view,
>> there
>>>> are dangerous waters ahead.
>>>
>>> I'm sure this is the kind of discussion mostly welcomed on this list,
>>> after all, this is what makes it a community project.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Mario
>>> --
>>> pgp key: http://subkeys.pgp.net/ PGP Key ID: 80F240CF
>>> Fingerprint: BA39 9666 94EC 8B73 27FA  FC7C 4086 63E3 80F2 40CF
>>>
>>> IcedRobot: www.icedrobot.org
>>> Proud GNU Classpath developer: http://www.classpath.org/
>>> Read About us at: http://planet.classpath.org
>>> OpenJDK: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/caciocavallo/
>>>
>>> Please, support open standards:
>>> http://endsoftpatents.org/
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> pgp key: http://subkeys.pgp.net/ PGP Key ID: 80F240CF
>> Fingerprint: BA39 9666 94EC 8B73 27FA  FC7C 4086 63E3 80F2 40CF
>>
>> IcedRobot: www.icedrobot.org
>> Proud GNU Classpath developer: http://www.classpath.org/
>> Read About us at: http://planet.classpath.org
>> OpenJDK: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/caciocavallo/
>>
>> Please, support open standards:
>> http://endsoftpatents.org/
>>