8u20 review request: RT-35635: new bundlers for fxpackager
Danno Ferrin
danno.ferrin at oracle.com
Fri Mar 14 18:25:48 UTC 2014
This is an interim commit, the next one will be just a move to com.oracle.bundlers. I would consider those to be the definitive api going forward for the bundlers portion. The com.sun.javafx package implies that these are useful only for JavaFX, which is not the case since we are adding daemon/service deployments.
For now I am doing the patches in place so that the diffs make sense. Move diffs… not so much.
On Mar 14, 2014, at 11:59 AM, Mark Fortner <phidias51 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Just out of curiousity, is there some reason that the new classes are in com.oracle and com.sun packages instead of just in a javafx.tools package?
>
> import com.oracle.bundlers.windows.WindowsBundlerParam;
> import com.sun.javafx.tools.packager.Log;
> import com.sun.javafx.tools.packager.bundlers.ConfigException;
> import com.sun.javafx.tools.packager.bundlers.IOUtils;
> import com.sun.javafx.tools.packager.bundlers.RelativeFileSet;
> If there's some chance that these implementations are going to be replaced, wouldn't it be better to at least declare their interfaces publicly in javafx.tools?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mark
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 4:43 AM, Anthony Petrov <anthony.petrov at oracle.com> wrote:
> Dmitry, all,
>
> Please post your review notes to JIRA to keep all the information in one place. We use the mailing list to send out review requests so that other people could start watching the bug and/or join the review. The review itself should happen in JIRA comments. Thank you in advance.
>
> --
> best regards,
> Anthony
>
>
> On 3/14/2014 3:21 PM, Dmitry Cherepanov wrote:
> Looks good to me.
>
> Thanks
> Dmitry
>
> On 3/13/14 11:08 PM, Danno Ferrin wrote:
> Kevin, Chris, Dmitry
> Please review. These are the new bundlers for the 8u20 packager, the
> daemon/services stuff Dmitry has been working on, and other related
> changes. It’s a big one so more eyes to find the stinkers before it
> gets committed would be appreciated.
>
> Jira: https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-35635 and
> https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-35969
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shemnon/RT-35635/webrev.00/
>
>
More information about the openjfx-dev
mailing list