ACTION REQUIRED: check your openjfx/8u-dev/rt repo
Kevin Rushforth
kevin.rushforth at oracle.com
Mon Mar 31 22:20:58 UTC 2014
Sure. No permanent harm done...
-- Kevin
Danno Ferrin wrote:
> This was my fault, and I would like to apologize for the inconvenience it has caused Kevin and anyone who accidentally downloaded the changes.
>
> As a consequence, I have changed my twitter icon to that of a dunce. (@shemnon)
>
> —Danno
>
> On Mar 31, 2014, at 2:50 PM, Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushforth at oracle.com> wrote:
>
>
>> To: All OpenJFX developers,
>>
>> We have fixed the 8u-dev/rt repo to remove the 136 bad changesets that were mistakenly pushed.
>>
>> If you have a clone of the http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8u-dev/rt repo and have pulled changesets any time in the last two hours, you must do the following:
>>
>> 1) Check to see whether you pulled any of the bad changesets:
>>
>> hg log -r 9eb3145c43ea
>>
>> if it says something like: "abort: unknown revision '9eb3145c43ea'" then you are GOOD. Nothing more for you to do.
>>
>>
>> 2) If the above hg log command reports the presence of the bad changeset:
>>
>> changeset: NNNN:9eb3145c43ea
>> user: shemnon
>> date: Wed Dec 11 13:45:41 2013 -0700
>> summary: beanify the fields in BundleParams
>>
>> then you must fix your repo. You must either "hg strip 9eb3145c43ea", which will strip the bad changeset along with its descendants, or you must re-clone your repo.
>>
>>
>> Let me know if you have any questions.
>>
>> -- Kevin
>>
>>
>> Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>>
>>> All OpenJFX devlopers:
>>>
>>> We need to rollback (or recreate) the openjfx/8u-dev/rt repo on hg.openjdk.java.net to remove some inadvertently pushed changesets. In order to minimize problems we ask everyone to refrain from pulling changes until I give the "all clear".
>>>
>>> -- Kevin
>>>
>>>
>
>
More information about the openjfx-dev
mailing list