Anyone using JMX with JavaFX?

Fri Jun 10 12:01:10 UTC 2016

Okay this thread is about what to do with javafx jmx plugin. How does that
even relate to whether oracle is using javafx internally?

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016, 7:52 PM Felix Bembrick <felix.bembrick at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Unfortunately, it has a lot to do with it.
>
> Do you actually realise how much of the entire JMC is written using
> JavaFX? (Not to mention what percentage of Java developers even know about
> or use JMC).
>
> Please check and then feel free to respond and enlighten us all with your
> findings.  100%? At least 90% surely? Hmm...
>
> And, if there are actually any *other* "vestiges" of JavaFX usage within
> Oracle, I would be delighted to hear about them!
>
> In fact, I am confident the entire JavaFX community would absolutely love
> to hear that it's obviously being used in  hundreds of internal
> applications (especially with Oracle being such a huge Java-focused
> company).  I mean it is the "standard" way of building GUI applications
> with Java right? So of course they would have no reason whatsoever to not
> base their entire internal software product suite on this advanced and
> clearly well supported technology.
>
> And throw in the dozens of commercial JavaFX offerings from Oracle and...
>
> > On 10 Jun 2016, at 21:01, Tom Schindl <tom.schindl at bestsolution.at>
> wrote:
> >
> > What has the removal of JMX for JavaFX todo with Oracle using JavaFX
> > themselves?
> >
> > There are projects at Oracle who for sure do use JavaFX and one of them
> > is installed in your JDK! It's Java-Mission-Control.
> >
> > Tom
> >
> >> On 10.06.16 12:46, Felix Bembrick wrote:
> >> I am taking that as a "yes" answer to my original question.
> >>
> >> On a completely unrelated topic, do Microsoft employees all have Macs
> on their desktops and carry iPhones and iPads around?
> >>
> >> No?
> >>
> >> Well I bet Apple employees do!
> >>
> >>> On 10 Jun 2016, at 20:01, dalibor topic <dalibor.topic at oracle.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I suspect that particular plugin is extremely rarely used, judging by
> https://github.com/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=%22javafx-mx.jar%22&type=Code&ref=searchresults
> showing 0 results.
> >>>
> >>> cheers,
> >>> dalibor topic
> >>>
> >>>> On 09.06.2016 00:31, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> >>>> As some of you may be aware, JavaFX has shipped a JMX plugin as a
> >>>> separate jar file along with the JDK (not part of the JRE) in
> >>>> <JDK>/lib/javafx-mx.jar. Development on this plugin stopped prior to
> JDK
> >>>> 8 being shipped, although we continued to ship javafx-mx.jar in JDK 8.
> >>>>
> >>>> Are there any developers that still use this? We haven't seen any bug
> >>>> reports or had questions on it for quite a while. I note that this jar
> >>>> file has been gone from JDK 9 ea since build 111 and we are trying to
> >>>> determine how best to address this in JDK 9.
> >>>>
> >>>> Our options are:
> >>>>
> >>>> 1) Remove it entirely and drop this tooling support
> >>>>
> >>>> 2) Continue to ship it as a legacy jar file, meaning that any use
> would
> >>>> require command line qualified exports to be added since it uses
> >>>> internal packages
> >>>>
> >>>> 3) Turn it into a proper JDK-only module, javafx.jmx; it would not be
> >>>> one of the default modules, so it would need to be added with
> -addmods.
> >>>>
> >>>> Obviously #1 would be the least amount of work, and given that it
> isn't
> >>>> being actively maintained, might be a viable solution. If we do need
> to
> >>>> keep it, then #2 might be less effort than #3, while still preserving
> >>>> the ability for developers to use it. This is only used for tooling,
> so
> >>>> requiring qualified exports, as is done for Robot and
> >>>> PerformanceTracker, is not a problem.
> >>>>
> >>>> Separately, if we don't remove it for JDK 9, we probably will
> deprecate
> >>>> it with the intention to remove it in a future release.
> >>>>
> >>>> -- Kevin
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
> >>> Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961
> >>> <tel:+491737185961>
> >>>
> >>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
> >>>
> >>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
> >>> Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
> >>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603
> >>>
> >>> Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
> >>> Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
> >>> Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
> >>> Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher
> >>>
> >>> <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing
> >>> practices and products that help protect the environment
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thomas Schindl, CTO
> > BestSolution.at EDV Systemhaus GmbH
> > Eduard-Bodem-Gasse 5-7, A-6020 Innsbruck
> > http://www.bestsolution.at/
> > Reg. Nr. FN 222302s am Firmenbuchgericht Innsbruck
>
-- 
Cheers,
Ranie Jade Ramiso
Software Engineer
w: http://polymorphicpanda.io