[9] Review request: 8170701: Update FXML documentation for setAccessible

[Mandy Chung]

> On Mar 6, 2017, at 7:11 AM, Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushforth at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Mandy Chung wrote:
>> 
>>> On Mar 4, 2017, at 5:14 PM, Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushforth at oracle.com> <mailto:kevin.rushforth at oracle.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8170701/webrev.01/ <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8170701/webrev.01/>
>>> 
>>>     
>> 
>>   40  * object {@link Module#isOpen opens} the containing package to the
>> 
>> Nit: s/@link/@linkplain
>> 
>>   41  * {@code javafx.fxml} module, either in its {@link ModuleDescriptor}
>>   42  * (module-info.class) or by calling {@link Module#addOpens}.
>> 
>> Do you intend to take out “(module-info.class)”?  
>>   
> 
> I was thinking to leave it in, since module-info.class is the most common way to specify a ModuleDescription. Maybe better would be:
> 
>     @{link ModuleDescriptor} (e.g., in its module-info.class)
> 

That’s okay.
>>   43  * An object is also reflectively accessible if it is declared as public,
>> 
>> Does “it” mean its constructor?
>>   
> 
> No. It means the declaration itself, for example:
> 
>     @FXML
>     public String myString;
> 
> 
> as opposed to:
> 
>     @FXML
>     private String myString;

I see.   I’m not close to this spec.  I am not sure if it worths further clarification such as “it is a public member”.  I’ll leave it up for you to decide.

Mandy