Error while pushing changeset

Wed Jan 10 16:05:46 UTC 2018

The bug has now been moved to the JDK project, so the ID has changed to 
8194871.

https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8194871

I'll upload your webrev once you send it.

Thanks.

-- Kevin

Nir Lisker wrote:
> Submitted a new bug with ID: 9052190.
>
> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 10:51 PM, Kevin Rushforth 
> <kevin.rushforth at oracle.com <mailto:kevin.rushforth at oracle.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
>     Nir Lisker wrote:
>>
>>         If there isn't an existing JBS issue, then please file one
>>
>>
>>     I thought I would point to "8188314: Fix typos in FX API docs"
>>     even though the exact changes I'm proposing are not listed there,
>>     but I can submit a new bug just for those if it really matters
>>     (it will be another Fix Typos issue).
>
>     We'll need a new JBS bug, since that one is already resolved with
>     a changeset (every changeset needs a unique bug ID). Feel free to
>     use the same synopsis if you like.
>
>
>>      
>>
>>         I also note that with simple javadoc changes, this can be
>>         done prior to your OCA being recorded if you like
>>
>>
>>     Yes, as a Participant. Iv'e signed the Sun CA some 7 years ago
>>     and this week signed the OCA in case it didn't transfer over.
>>     It's not crucial to handle it right now since the changes are
>>     trivial.
>
>     Good.
>
>>
>>         I haven't gotten to your email from yesterday
>>
>>
>>     It's a bit of a loaded one so it can wait after the RDP. I only
>>     needed the minimum info to get these fixes before the RDP.
>
>     OK.
>
>     -- Kevin
>
>
>>     - Nir
>>
>>     On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 9:43 PM, Kevin Rushforth
>>     <kevin.rushforth at oracle.com <mailto:kevin.rushforth at oracle.com>>
>>     wrote:
>>
>>         > I also note that tith simple javadoc changes...
>>
>>         "with" simple ...
>>
>>         -- Kevin
>>
>>
>>
>>         Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>             Nir Lisker wrote:
>>
>>                 > This shows a lack of understanding about our processes
>>
>>                 Yes it does, which is why I asked about it yesterday.
>>                 I'll send a webrev.
>>
>>
>>             Ah, I haven't gotten to your email from yesterday, since
>>             I was on vacation and am still catching up. If you can
>>             send a webrev, and a pointer to a JBS issue, I'll attach
>>             it for you. If there isn't an existing JBS issue, then
>>             please file one (and I'll see that it gets moved into the
>>             JDK project quickly). I also note that tith simple
>>             javadoc changes, this can be done prior to your OCA being
>>             recorded if you like.
>>
>>             Thanks.
>>
>>             -- Kevin
>>
>>
>>
>>                 Thanks,
>>                 Nir
>>
>>
>>                 On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 8:50 PM, Kevin Rushforth
>>                 <kevin.rushforth at oracle.com
>>                 <mailto:kevin.rushforth at oracle.com>
>>                 <mailto:kevin.rushforth at oracle.com
>>                 <mailto:kevin.rushforth at oracle.com>>> wrote:
>>
>>                     Why would you even try to push a changeset
>>                 without getting it
>>                     reviewed first???
>>
>>                     This shows a lack of understanding about our
>>                 processes and
>>                     policies. Only committers have permission to push
>>                 changesets, and
>>                     only after review. Please familiarize yourself
>>                 with the policies
>>                     and procedures surrounding contributing to
>>                 OpenJFX [1] [2] [3] [4]
>>                     [5]. Once you are familiar with these policies
>>                 and have signed the
>>                     Oracle Contributor Agreement (OCA) you can work
>>                 with someone to
>>                     sponsor your change.
>>
>>                     -- Kevin
>>
>>                     [1] http://openjdk.java.net/contribute/
>>                 <http://openjdk.java.net/contribute/>
>>                     <http://openjdk.java.net/contribute/
>>                 <http://openjdk.java.net/contribute/>>
>>                     [2]
>>                 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/community/oca-486395.html
>>                 <http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/community/oca-486395.html>
>>                    
>>                 <http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/community/oca-486395.html
>>                 <http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/community/oca-486395.html>>
>>                     [3]
>>                    
>>                 https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Submitting+a+Bug+Report
>>                 <https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Submitting+a+Bug+Report>
>>                    
>>                 <https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Submitting+a+Bug+Report
>>                 <https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Submitting+a+Bug+Report>>
>>                     [4]
>>                 https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Code+Reviews
>>                 <https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Code+Reviews>
>>                    
>>                 <https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Code+Reviews
>>                 <https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Code+Reviews>>
>>                     [5]
>>                    
>>                 https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Committing+the+Code
>>                 <https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Committing+the+Code>
>>                    
>>                 <https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Committing+the+Code
>>                 <https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Committing+the+Code>>
>>
>>
>>
>>                     Nir Lisker wrote:
>>
>>                         Iv'e created a small documentation fix and
>>                 tried to push it to
>>                         http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/jfx-dev/rt
>>                 <http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/jfx-dev/rt>
>>                        
>>                 <http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/jfx-dev/rt
>>                 <http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/jfx-dev/rt>>. I
>>                 got an error:
>>
>>                         abort: push creates new remote head 2152a80ee902!
>>                         hint: pull and merge or see 'hg help push'
>>                 for details about
>>                         pushing new
>>                         heads
>>                         [command returned code 255 Tue Jan 09
>>                 19:40:10 2018]
>>
>>                         What can be the problem?
>>                        
>>
>>
>