Error while pushing changeset

[Nir Lisker]

Submitted a new bug with ID: 9052190.

On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 10:51 PM, Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushforth at oracle.com
> wrote:

>
>
> Nir Lisker wrote:
>
> If there isn't an existing JBS issue, then please file one
>
>
> I thought I would point to "8188314: Fix typos in FX API docs" even though
> the exact changes I'm proposing are not listed there, but I can submit a
> new bug just for those if it really matters (it will be another Fix Typos
> issue).
>
>
> We'll need a new JBS bug, since that one is already resolved with a
> changeset (every changeset needs a unique bug ID). Feel free to use the
> same synopsis if you like.
>
>
>
>
>> I also note that with simple javadoc changes, this can be done prior to
>> your OCA being recorded if you like
>
>
> Yes, as a Participant. Iv'e signed the Sun CA some 7 years ago and this
> week signed the OCA in case it didn't transfer over. It's not crucial to
> handle it right now since the changes are trivial.
>
>
> Good.
>
>
> I haven't gotten to your email from yesterday
>
>
> It's a bit of a loaded one so it can wait after the RDP. I only needed the
> minimum info to get these fixes before the RDP.
>
>
> OK.
>
> -- Kevin
>
>
> - Nir
>
> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 9:43 PM, Kevin Rushforth <
> kevin.rushforth at oracle.com> wrote:
>
>> > I also note that tith simple javadoc changes...
>>
>> "with" simple ...
>>
>> -- Kevin
>>
>>
>>
>> Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Nir Lisker wrote:
>>>
>>>> > This shows a lack of understanding about our processes
>>>>
>>>> Yes it does, which is why I asked about it yesterday. I'll send a
>>>> webrev.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ah, I haven't gotten to your email from yesterday, since I was on
>>> vacation and am still catching up. If you can send a webrev, and a pointer
>>> to a JBS issue, I'll attach it for you. If there isn't an existing JBS
>>> issue, then please file one (and I'll see that it gets moved into the JDK
>>> project quickly). I also note that tith simple javadoc changes, this can be
>>> done prior to your OCA being recorded if you like.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> -- Kevin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Nir
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 8:50 PM, Kevin Rushforth <
>>>> kevin.rushforth at oracle.com <mailto:kevin.rushforth at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     Why would you even try to push a changeset without getting it
>>>>     reviewed first???
>>>>
>>>>     This shows a lack of understanding about our processes and
>>>>     policies. Only committers have permission to push changesets, and
>>>>     only after review. Please familiarize yourself with the policies
>>>>     and procedures surrounding contributing to OpenJFX [1] [2] [3] [4]
>>>>     [5]. Once you are familiar with these policies and have signed the
>>>>     Oracle Contributor Agreement (OCA) you can work with someone to
>>>>     sponsor your change.
>>>>
>>>>     -- Kevin
>>>>
>>>>     [1] http://openjdk.java.net/contribute/
>>>>     <http://openjdk.java.net/contribute/>
>>>>     [2] http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/community/oca-486395.html
>>>>     <http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/community/oca-486395.html>
>>>>     [3]
>>>>     https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Submitting+a+B
>>>> ug+Report
>>>>     <https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Submitting+a+
>>>> Bug+Report>
>>>>     [4] https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Code+Reviews
>>>>     <https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Code+Reviews>
>>>>     [5]
>>>>     https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Committing+the+Code
>>>>     <https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Committing+the+Code>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     Nir Lisker wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         Iv'e created a small documentation fix and tried to push it to
>>>>         http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/jfx-dev/rt
>>>>         <http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/jfx-dev/rt>. I got an
>>>> error:
>>>>
>>>>         abort: push creates new remote head 2152a80ee902!
>>>>         hint: pull and merge or see 'hg help push' for details about
>>>>         pushing new
>>>>         heads
>>>>         [command returned code 255 Tue Jan 09 19:40:10 2018]
>>>>
>>>>         What can be the problem?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>