RFR: 8316135: Create release notes for JavaFX 21 [v3]

Wed Sep 13 12:07:07 UTC 2023

On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 11:54:51 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <kcr at openjdk.org> wrote:

>>> Note that we need to use the base bug ID for backports that were first fixed in jfx21
>> 
>> Can you shed some light on this for future reference?
>> 
>> In case of [JDK-8313324](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313324), we do not use the base bug id. The same was also applied to jfx21.0.1, should we be using [JDK-8313331](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313331) or the base bug id for 21.0.1 release notes?
>
> We should _always_ use the base bug ID and _never_ the backport ID, which for this bug is [JDK-8313227](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313227).
> 
> I will look into adjusting the JBS filter to make this a less error-prone process (using the `masterbug` macro which will provide the base bug IDs for a given set of backports).

> We should always use the base bug ID and never the backport ID, which for this bug is [JDK-8313227](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313227).

And to be clear I meant that the "base bug ID" for this bug is [JDK-8313227](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313227).

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1239#discussion_r1324409266