Proposal: JavaFX Incubator Modules
John Hendrikx
john.hendrikx at gmail.com
Sun Nov 3 15:46:18 UTC 2024
I can only second this. I haven't looked at the RichTextArea, but find
it extremely odd to hear that it also includes part of the input map
proposal instead of just a new Control/Skin/Behavior. Any changes to
how input maps work should be a separate proposal and PR.
--John
On 02/11/2024 00:19, Michael Strauß wrote:
> I think it should be made clear that incubation is not an alternative
> to, or a path around community concensus. Specifically, I'm looking at
> the RichTextArea proposal, which seems to also incubate the InputMap
> proposal. If we accepted the incubation of incidental features without
> community concensus, then surely at some point in the future, we'd be
> discussing that we now must commit to a controversial incidental
> feature because the momentum is too strong, or because we'd be
> breaking code of too many users that are already using the new
> features. Any discussion around promoting the main incubating feature
> to API, and dropping incidental features will be tainted with
> real-world usage arguments.
More information about the openjfx-dev
mailing list