[Feature Proposal]: TriangleMesh - Vertex Color Support

[Knee Snap]

Thanks for the feedback! I'm hopeful that texture wrapping/filtering can be
added at some point too, I've definitely had times where it'd be helpful,
though I do appreciate REPEAT textures being the default behavior at least
(even if that's not actually a documented feature...)

A small (but non-trivial) amount of work will go a long way into improving
JavaFX 3D quite a bit, and I hope that I can contribute at least a bit
towards that.

On Wed, Sep 4, 2024, 12:45 AM Risto Vaher <ristovaher1213 at gmail.com> wrote:

> I have been using JavaFX's 3D api for a while now and i think this is an
> important addition and it would benefit me quite a lot, but honestly i have
> come to accept that improving the 3D api is not a priority for JavaFX,
> neither important at all (probably because there are not that many people
> actually using it, which is a shame because i think it could be quite great)
> Very obvious features are still missing from it after many years, vertex
> colors being one of them but also texture filtering and wrapping mode which
> would be trivial to implement since every graphics API supports it and it
> is quite an important feature imo.
>
> As for your specific proposal, im all for it and i think it should be
> implemented because every engine/graphics API that is at least half decent
> supports vertex colors and i believe it is an important feature.
>
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 7:53 AM Knee Snap <kneester77 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> This is a continuation of a previous email thread: "[Feature Proposal]
>> Vertex Colors on TriangleMesh".
>> I'm creating a new email thread because after discussion I've put
>> together a feature proposal, and it serves largely as a summary of the
>> previous email thread. (Better organized as a feature proposal)
>>
>> *Feature Proposal:*
>> https://github.com/Kneesnap/misc-public/blob/main/documents/javafx/feature-proposals/vertex-colors/proposal.md
>> I had previously discussed a draft PR, but considering how simple the
>> proposed public API additions are to discuss, I don't think it's actually
>> that helpful.
>>
>> *What's next?*
>> I'm currently happy with the design and seeing as it's been discussed
>> already, I could probably ask Kevin for a review. But, I'd like to give
>> another opportunity for design discussion before doing so, just in-case
>> there are any further considerations brought up.
>> So, I open up the floor again. Does anyone have any thoughts on this
>> proposal? Concerns? Questions? Suggestions? Constructive criticism? I
>> eagerly await the feedback.
>>
>> After API discussion concludes, I plan to pass it off to Kevin for
>> review/approval, and if it is approved, the subsequent CSR creation.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/openjfx-dev/attachments/20240904/84b3d076/attachment-0001.htm>