RFR: 8357625: Build should generate platform specific shaders [v3]

[Ambarish Rapte]

On Wed, 18 Feb 2026 15:35:38 GMT, Andy Goryachev <angorya at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> I guess the question I have then is - _why_ these files are a part of Eclipse config files.
>> 
>> This is a build directory, which technically should contain only artifacts related to building JavaFX. Why would HLSL compilation artifacts be needed at all in Eclipse?
>
> They contain runtime resources.  Without these directories,
> 
> 
> RenderJob.run: internal exception
> java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError
> 	at javafx.graphics/com.sun.prism.mtl.MTLResourceFactory.<init>(MTLResourceFactory.java:61)
> 	at javafx.graphics/com.sun.prism.mtl.MTLPipeline.getResourceFactory(MTLPipeline.java:93)
> 	at javafx.graphics/com.sun.prism.mtl.MTLPipeline.getDefaultResourceFactory(MTLPipeline.java:84)
> 	at javafx.graphics/com.sun.prism.GraphicsPipeline.getDefaultResourceFactory(GraphicsPipeline.java:155)
> 	at javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.tk.quantum.QuantumRenderer.lambda$1(QuantumRenderer.java:155)
> 	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:545)
> 	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:369)
> 	at javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.tk.RenderJob.run(RenderJob.java:58)
> 	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1090)
> 	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:614)
> 	at javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.tk.quantum.QuantumRenderer$PipelineRunnable.run(QuantumRenderer.java:122)
> 	at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1474)
> Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: java.io.IOException: Stream closed
> 	at javafx.graphics/com.sun.prism.mtl.MTLContext.<clinit>(MTLContext.java:109)
> 	... 12 more
> Caused by: java.io.IOException: Stream closed
> 	at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.getInIfOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:170)
> 
> 
> see https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8329783

Reverted the change and updated the existing comment to specify Eclipse. Please retest.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/2071#discussion_r2823626542