mp at jugs.org
Tue Jan 21 18:04:27 UTC 2020
to me this sounds like a question which is fully answered by the official
docs here: https://openjfx.io/openjfx-docs/
If you later want to know how to package up the whole thing to get a real
platform application with installer and everything, then have a look here:
Am 21.01.20 um 18:56 schrieb AmnoJeeuw:
> Thanks Robert for your help.
> I am glad that you are able to create OpenJFX applications that
> execute/run on Windows. Can you please explain, in detail, how you'd
> create a simple OpenJFX that includes one jar file, one pure java
> source file and one pure JavaFX file.
> Thanks in advance.
> On 2020-01-16 11:32 a.m., Robert Lichtenberger wrote:
>> No offence taken and I can fully understand any doubts you have JFX.
>> To label it (and any C++ GUI toolkit) unproductive however seems
>> exaggerated to me. After all, we've been using JavaFX in production
>> (medical software) for years now (using Java 8 and Java 11+ ...).
>> JavaFX is (and should be) a GUI Toolkit. Together with a JDK it can
>> be used to produce quite nice looking applications that will run on
>> many platforms and are not distinguishable from "native" binaries,
>> which (from a UX experience) seems to me far better than executable
>> .jar - Files.
>> If you have a .jar File you wish to execute, I suggest you continue
>> using Java / JavaFX 8. You may try running it with a brand new
>> Liberica JDK (https://bell-sw.com/) which still contains JavaFX
>> within the JDK although the common consensus is that JavaFX should
>> these days really be separated from the JDK.
>> If you are in control of the source code of this piece of software I
>> suggest you take the leap and port it to Java 11+. I've done that
>> with our applications.
>> Am Do., 16. Jan. 2020 um 16:17 Uhr schrieb Amn Ojee Uw
>> <amnojeeuw at gmail.com <mailto:amnojeeuw at gmail.com>>:
>> Look no offence, but I am having doubts about JFX because, for
>> some reason, the 'executable jar' files are no longer executables,
>> no irony intended. Worst part of it all is that no answer to the
>> proble can be found; the only answers I have found are rhetorical
>> answers such as *have you read this or that web page?*
>> I hope someone is able to fix this issue and post it on the
>> internet; in the mean time JFX is just like any C++ GUI toolkit,
>> something very good but unproductive.
>> On Thu, Jan 16, 2020, 8:16 AM Robert Lichtenberger,
>> <r.lichtenberger at gmail.com <mailto:r.lichtenberger at gmail.com>>
>> Hello FX-world :-)
>> following up on some interesting discussions at the JFX Days
>> in Zürich last
>> december, I've finally managed to extract the (closed source)
>> validation library into an open source project.
>> ValidatorFX can be found under:
>> I am looking forward to your feedback,
>> Robert Lichtenberger
More information about the openjfx-discuss