RFC: Refactoring SystemABI

[Samuel Audet]

On 12/05/2018 07:58 PM, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote:
> 
> On 05/12/2018 06:12, Samuel Audet wrote:
>> Actually, I think that would be a great way to go about it. Basically, 
>> for AOT we know we can do what Substrate VM does, and for when JIT is 
>> available it could go the SystemABI route, but where the higher-level 
>> API and annotations are the same. Their API doesn't use a lot of 
>> generics though and I'm sure it would need to be tweaked, so your team 
>> and their team would need to come to an understanding. Is this 
>> something that sounds achievable? 
> 
> Right - the API do have differences and will need to converge at some 
> point, we are aware of that :-)

Happy to hear that! I will make sure to follow the progress here and 
over there.

Samuel