[vector] Unary/Ternary ops

[Al K]

Any idea what the interfaces for masked variants would look like? I
imagine we'd have to create additional functional interfaces for each
op to accept mask argument as well (f.e. unop would be a binop with
1 vector 1 mask, binop would be ternop with 2 vectors 1 mask, etc.).
Would it be better to just have 2 functional interfaces, f.e.,

interface VecOperator<V> {
    V apply(V... xn);
}

interface VecMaskOperator<V, M> {
    V apply(M mask, V... xn);
}

Something like that work?

Cheers,
Al

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 12:26 PM, Paul Sandoz <paul.sandoz at oracle.com>
wrote:

>
>
> > On Feb 14, 2018, at 10:12 AM, Al K <someusername3 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Oops, wrong patch link, see
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vlivanov/panama/al_miftah/
> vector_ops/webrev.00/index.html
> >
>
> One comment:
>
> - For fma I recommend creating a package private TriFunction rather than
> packing into an array, then i think the additional casts will be redundant.
>
> Thanks,
> Paul.
>
> > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 11:54 AM, Al K <someusername3 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vlivanov/panama/vector.
> generalized_intrinsics/webrev.06/
> >>
> >>
> >> This extends the generalized intrinsics changeset with the following:
> >>
> >> 1. General ternary ops - currently only fma
> >>
> >> 2. General unary ops - abs/neg/sqrt
> >>
> >>
> >> I've replaced the previous inline_vector_binary_operation() in
> opto/library_call
> >>
> >> with a generic inline_vector_nary_operation() to avoid writing
> specialized impls
> >>
> >> for the various n-ary ops.
> >>
> >>
> >> There's also a change in os/linux/os_linux to fix the pointer
> comparison so clang
> >>
> >> would stop complaining.
> >>
> >>
> >> I've signed the OCA, awaiting for it to be reflected on the site.
> >>
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Al
> >>
> >>
>
>