Toward distributions of native libraries
Samuel Audet
samuel.audet at gmail.com
Sun Jan 13 03:42:53 UTC 2019
Thanks for the feedback! If it were a priority, and if it were me, I would
start by ensuring that the high-level API can also be optimized in the case
of AOT, but this isn't happening at the moment. I just shortened it this
way because I consider AOT to be just as important as JIT. How do you feel
I should phrase this then? That it isn't a priority /only in the case of
AOT/? I'll edit it that way if that's accurate! If not, I would welcome
additional explanations, for example, see
https://github.com/oracle/graal/issues/885 . Thanks
Samuel
2019年1月12日(土) 0:48、Maurizio Cimadamore さん(maurizio.cimadamore at oracle.com
)のメッセージ:
> One fact to straighten:
>
> "faster-than-JNI performance is not a priority"
>
> As you can see from [1], a branch was created almost two months ago and
> is actively worked on. It is not yet 100% stable on large benchmarks,
> but is good enough to pass all the tests. Vlad will surely post more
> here when the effort is closer to completion.
>
> Maurizio
>
> [1] -
>
> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/panama-dev/2018-November/003250.html
>
>
> On 11/01/2019 14:30, Samuel Audet wrote:
> > Hello, John, Maurizio, and all Panama developers,
> >
> > I wrote a post about the importance in having distributions of native
> > libraries for Java, and where I see Panama fit in all this:
> > http://bytedeco.org/news/2019/01/11/importance-of-a-distribution/
> >
> > I hope it provides some context to help understand where you could
> > best focus your efforts. I think I got all the facts straight, but
> > please let me know of any inaccuracies! Thank you
> >
> > Samuel
>
More information about the panama-dev
mailing list