Gihub Action, CI pipeline

[Maurizio Cimadamore]

Thanks Giuseppe,
while we *could* enable GitHub actions as a why to have some CI (like we 
have in upstream JDK) it would not be ok for us to use GitHub actions to 
publish binaries. The binaries we publish end up in jdk.java.net [1] and 
we have no plans to change that.

Maurizio

[1] - https://jdk.java.net/panama/

On 21/06/2021 15:22, Giuseppe Barbieri wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Erik replied that it's up to the people/devs working on panama to 
> decide whether to use Github Actions or not
>
> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2021-June/031568.html 
> <https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2021-June/031568.html>
>
> So, in case you guys are interested, I fixed the linux64 and macos64 
> builds: now the clang llvm 12.0 binaries will be downloaded (and cached)
>
> https://github.com/elect86/panama-foreign/actions/runs/956676104 
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/elect86/panama-foreign/actions/runs/956676104__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!Md7JpHsnMI7luw_E1kqYB92RddS1pV9u75NnDo1kSZ1B3VUyUtqgxbJySUhdn3sP74phxIA$>
>
> I'm publishing everything, every kind of builds plus all the test 
> results and supports
>
> https://github.com/elect86/panama-foreign/releases 
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/elect86/panama-foreign/releases__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!Md7JpHsnMI7luw_E1kqYB92RddS1pV9u75NnDo1kSZ1B3VUyUtqgxbJySUhdn3sP8YL9fxQ$>
>
> Right now there is an additional workflow which check every 10m if 
> there are any new commits upstream, but this of course won't be needed 
> if the whole gets merged
>
> There is just some minor polishing left regarding the release text to 
> do, but this is minor stuff
>
>
> Giuseppe
>
> Il giorno mar 15 giu 2021 alle ore 22:26 Giuseppe Barbieri 
> <elect86 at gmail.com <mailto:elect86 at gmail.com>> ha scritto:
>
>         This is not possible - we do not publish builds using GitHub
>         actions.
>         This is not a panama decision, but a JDK-wide one.
>
>         If you want to discuss that I'd suggest to redirect your
>         question to a
>         more general forum like jdk-dev or build-dev.
>
>
>     Ok, I'll propose maybe something over there then
>
>         I believe this has been fixed upstream - butt there were merge
>         issues
>         which we have rectified today. So perhaps it should be ok now?
>
>         Maurizio
>
>
>     Yes, it's, thanks
>
>     Giuseppe
>