code review request: 6911951: NTLM should be a supported Java SASL mechanism

[Michael McMahon]

Why is the serialVersionUid changed in  NTLMAuthentication?

Otherwise, the encapsulation of NTLM in the new API looks quite
concise and neat to me? Looks fine.

- Michael

Vincent Ryan wrote:
> The SASL component looks good Max.
>
> Michael/Chris: have you any comments on the NTLM changes?
>
>
>
> On 25/08/2010 06:23, Weijun Wang wrote:
>   
>> Ping again.
>>
>> The webrev is updated:
>>    http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/6911951/webrev.01/
>>
>> The CCC is about to be finalized:
>>    http://ccc.sfbay.sun.com/6911951
>>
>> Thanks
>> Max
>>
>> On 04/16/2010 11:12 AM, Weijun Wang wrote:
>>     
>>> Vinnie
>>>
>>> Please take a review on this webrev:
>>>
>>>     cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/6911951/webrev.00/
>>>
>>> I've updated the spec a little by making NTLMv2 as the default
>>> version. It has been supported for a long time and now default with
>>> Windows 7 and Server 2008 R2.
>>>
>>> Networking guys, are you OK with the rewrite of NTLMAuthentication?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Max
>>>
>>> On Jan 4, 2010, at 12:30 PM, Weijun.Wang at Sun.COM wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> *Change Request ID*: 6911951
>>>>
>>>> *Synopsis*: NTLM should be a supported Java SASL mechanism
>>>>
>>>> === *Description*
>>>> ============================================================
>>>> The NTLM support currently available for HTTP authentication should
>>>> be generalized
>>>> and made available as a Java SASL mechanism for use with other
>>>> protocols.
>>>>         
>
>