6995424 Code Review Request

[Mandy Chung]

  On 11/18/10 6:56 AM, Sean Mullan wrote:
> On 11/17/10 5:18 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> how about "isCustomProvider"? Your comment above describing the flag 
>> already
>> explains it's for backward compatibility.
>
> I changed it to isCustomPolicy since technically it isn't a Provider. 
> I also added more comments.
>

Thanks.  That's helpful.
> New webrev:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mullan/6995424/webrev.01/
>
Looks good.  Minor nits about indentation: In Policy.java
line 301, 303: need to indent one additional space
line 302-305: the block should indent 4 additional spaces
line 304: indented 5 spaces instead of 4; perhaps concat line 303-304 
together.
line 294-295,  311-312:
    The indentation convention used in the security classes may be 
different.  But it'd be good to use  the conventional indentation to 
align the second/third lines with the first parameter in the first line.

Thanks
Mandy