2nd round code review request: 7055363: jdk_security3 cleanup

[Xuelei Fan]

On 8/4/2011 10:34 AM, Weijun Wang wrote:
> Oh, that's true.
> 
> I'll add it back. Why did I remove it at the first place?
> 
You may not have to add it back, the library tag may help to build the
dependent classes. Maybe, we have some incorrect understand of the
"build" tag.

Xuelei

> Thanks
> Max
> 
> On 08/04/2011 10:11 AM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
>> . test/javax/security/auth/login/LoginContext/ResetConfigModule.java
>>
>> You removed the "run" tag, and "build" tag is the last tag. It seems
>> that the test will only run building, but not run the class.main(). I
>> got the strange behavior when I run some tests with build tag with jtreg
>> 4.1 b03. Did you come into the same issue?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Xuelei
>>
>> On 8/3/2011 11:50 AM, Weijun Wang wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 08/03/2011 12:43 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>>> Weijun Wang wrote:
>>>>> Hi All
>>>>>
>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/7055363/webrev.01/
>>>> I went through the changes to the tests and they look okay to me. It's
>>>> good to see so many tests removed from the problem list and the tests
>>>> updated to work in samevm or agentvm mode.
>>>>
>>>> Is there a bug created for the ec tests that are failing on
>>>> solaris-i586? If so then it would be good to include the bugID for
>>>
>>> I thought there was one but I cannot find it. *Vinnie*, do you know it?
>>>
>>>> future edits to the problem list. Also I see you've commented out
>>>> two ec
>>>> tests and I wonder if these lines should be removed or uncommented.
>>>
>>> I don't understand why these 2 pass now. Maybe they still fail on some
>>> platforms not in JPRT? Anyway, I just don't want to purge the lines.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> test/com/sun/security/auth/login/ConfigFile/IllegalURL.java - no
>>>> problem
>>>> with your change but I notice this test using URL's getFile which isn't
>>>> the right way to get to a file path. Could this be changed to using
>>>> File(URI)?
>>>
>>> This test is a compatibility check, see
>>>
>>>     http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jsn/jdk/rev/4e7ad09de58b
>>>
>>> I remember there were some strange things on Windows, say, UNC, \ vs /,
>>> that made some hand-crafted URL illegal. We cannot support all of them,
>>> so just make sure the old supported ones are still supported.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Max
>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Alan.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>