review request for 7011998: diamond conversion for jgss and pkcs11

Stuart Marks stuart.marks at oracle.com
Fri Jan 14 03:06:13 UTC 2011


Is there something in the source tree that needs to be modified so that 
sunpkcs11.jar gets updated properly? I see this file in my build output area:

     build/linux-i586/lib/ext/sunpkcs11.jar

but I presume this is created automatically by the build process, from .class 
files that are built from source. If not, can you (or someone) direct me as to 
what additional changes might be necessary?

s'marks



On 1/13/11 4:50 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
> If sunpkcs11.jar includes line number info (which I think yes), then it needs
> to be updated. Otherwise, line numbers shown in the exception stack info will
> not match the source code.
>
> Max
>
> On 01/14/2011 08:15 AM, Stuart Marks wrote:
>> Yes, the byte codes are identical. I compiled with -g:none before and
>> after the changes and the classfiles are all identical. (Even though the
>> bytecodes are identical, the classfiles would differ because of changed
>> line number information, which is disabled with -g:none.)
>>
>> So, I assume this means that sunpkcs11.jar doesn't need to be updated,
>> and that I can push this changeset without further changes?
>>
>> s'marks
>>
>> On 1/12/11 7:06 PM, Valerie (Yu-Ching) Peng wrote:
>>>
>>> The changes look good to me.
>>> BTW, I recall seeing in one of your earlier email that the byte code
>>> is the
>>> same w/ the usage of this diamond operator. Is this so?
>>> If not, then we need to update the sunpkcs11.jar also.
>>> Thanks,
>>> Valerie
>>>
>>> On 01/12/11 05:30 PM, Stuart Marks wrote:
>>>> Hi Valerie,
>>>>
>>>> You're up next for diamond conversion. :-)
>>>>
>>>> These should be pretty straightforward. Almost all changes are variable
>>>> initializations. There's one return statement, one use of diamond in a
>>>> ternary operator (a ? b : c), and one whitespace fixup.
>>>>
>>>> Webrev is here:
>>>>
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~smarks/reviews/7011998/webrev.0/
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> s'marks
>>>



More information about the security-dev mailing list