review request for 7011998: diamond conversion for jgss and pkcs11

Xuelei Fan xuelei.fan at oracle.com
Fri Jan 14 03:15:37 UTC 2011


Sorry, I did not look into this too much. I have a question about the
diamond conversion. Why we want to make the change like the following
code? What's the benefits?

private final static Map<BulkCipher,Boolean> availableCache =
-   new HashMap<BulkCipher,Boolean>(8);
+   new HashMap<>(8);

Thanks,
Andrew

On 1/14/2011 11:02 AM, Stuart Marks wrote:
> I did full clean builds of the JDK repo with -g:none, both with and
> without the diamond changes. I then compared all of the .class files in
> the two builds using the "cmp" command. The files were all identical,
> with the exception of two version classes which I think are
> auto-generated with date stamps or something. In any case all of the
> .class files corresponding to .java files in my changeset were
> byte-for-byte identical.
> 
> s'marks
> 
> On 1/13/11 4:41 PM, Valerie (Yu-Ching) Peng wrote:
>>
>> Which particular class did you compared? Just to double check...
>> Thanks,
>> Valerie
>>
>> On 01/13/11 04:15 PM, Stuart Marks wrote:
>>> Yes, the byte codes are identical. I compiled with -g:none before and
>>> after
>>> the changes and the classfiles are all identical. (Even though the
>>> bytecodes
>>> are identical, the classfiles would differ because of changed line
>>> number
>>> information, which is disabled with -g:none.)
>>>
>>> So, I assume this means that sunpkcs11.jar doesn't need to be
>>> updated, and
>>> that I can push this changeset without further changes?
>>>
>>> s'marks
>>>
>>> On 1/12/11 7:06 PM, Valerie (Yu-Ching) Peng wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The changes look good to me.
>>>> BTW, I recall seeing in one of your earlier email that the byte code
>>>> is the
>>>> same w/ the usage of this diamond operator. Is this so?
>>>> If not, then we need to update the sunpkcs11.jar also.
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Valerie
>>>>
>>>> On 01/12/11 05:30 PM, Stuart Marks wrote:
>>>>> Hi Valerie,
>>>>>
>>>>> You're up next for diamond conversion. :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> These should be pretty straightforward. Almost all changes are
>>>>> variable
>>>>> initializations. There's one return statement, one use of diamond in a
>>>>> ternary operator (a ? b : c), and one whitespace fixup.
>>>>>
>>>>> Webrev is here:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~smarks/reviews/7011998/webrev.0/
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> s'marks
>>>>
>>




More information about the security-dev mailing list