JDK8 Code review request for 7133344: Document the java.security.properties system property feature in the java.security file

Sean Mullan sean.mullan at oracle.com
Tue Jul 3 12:00:09 UTC 2012


On 7/3/12 7:57 AM, Weijun Wang wrote:
> The current line 25 has a "#" and I prefer it to be a real empty line.

Ok, I understand now. Yes, I agree that would be a good change.

--Sean

> 
> -Max
> 
> On 07/03/2012 07:49 PM, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> On 7/2/12 11:14 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
>>> One minor thing:
>>>
>>> Line 25 should be empty, this starts another paragraph on providers.
>>
>> I'm not sure I understand the comment as it is empty already.
>>
>> --Sean
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Max
>>>
>>> On 07/03/2012 01:34 AM, Sean Mullan wrote:
>>>> Yep, looks good.
>>>>
>>>> On 07/02/2012 11:59 AM, Tom Hawtin wrote:
>>>>> Looks good.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tom
>>>>>
>>>>> On 02/07/2012 16:54, Jason Uh wrote:
>>>>>> Thanks for your comments.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please see updated webrev:
>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~juh/7133344/webrev.01
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jason
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 07/02/2012 08:45 AM, Tom Hawtin wrote:
>>>>>>> On 02/07/2012 16:00, Jason Uh wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This change is documentation for allowing a user to specify an
>>>>>>>> alternate
>>>>>>>> java.security file.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~juh/7133344/webrev.00/
>>>>>>>> CR: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7133344
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +# An alternate java.security properties file may be specified
>>>>>>> +# from the command line via the system property
>>>>>>> +#
>>>>>>> +# java.security.properties=<URL>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think that should be:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +# -Djava.security.properties=<URL>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tom
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> 




More information about the security-dev mailing list