[8] Request for Review: 8022461: Fix lint warnings in sun.security.{provider, rsa, x509}
Jason Uh
jason.uh at oracle.com
Wed Aug 7 23:13:12 UTC 2013
On 8/6/13 6:30 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
> Change looks fine.
>
> Minor issue:
>
> Extra parenthesis in
> src/share/classes/sun/security/rsa/RSAPublicKeyImpl.java:
>
> + byte[] keyArray =
> + (new DerValue(DerValue.tag_Sequence,
> + out.toByteArray())).toByteArray();
Thanks, I've removed the extra parentheses.
> One question:
>
> In src/share/classes/sun/security/x509/X509Key.java, two fields are now
> not recommended:
>
> @Deprecated
> protected byte[] key = null;
>
> /*
> * The number of bits unused in the last byte of the key.
> * Added to keep the byte[] key form consistent with the BitArray
> * form. Can de deleted when byte[] key is deleted.
> */
> private int unusedBits = 0;
>
> I understand that key should be marked @Deprecated because it's
> protected and therefore part of (although private) API, but what about
> unusedBits? Is it better to also mark it @Deprecated?
I see what you mean. But is it OK to mark private members @Deprecated? I
don't know if that violates convention or not. Let me know if you'd like
me to add that, and I'll include it in this change.
Thanks,
Jason
> Thanks
> Max
>
> On 8/7/13 7:51 AM, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> Hi Jason,
>>
>> Looks fine to me, but a security reviewer should approve as well.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -Joe
>>
>> On 08/06/2013 04:46 PM, Jason Uh wrote:
>>> Joe, Sean,
>>>
>>> Could I please get a review of this changeset? This change fixes
>>> deprecation warnings in:
>>> sun.security.provider
>>> sun.security.rsa
>>> sun.security.x509
>>>
>>> In sun.security.provider and sun.security.rsa, I change the use of
>>> sun.security.x509.X509Key's key bytes to the BitArray form of the key.
>>>
>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~juh/8022461/webrev.00/
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jason
>>
More information about the security-dev
mailing list