Code Review request: 8029550 javadoc updates

[Bradford Wetmore]

I really don't think formatting changes as part of other approved 
changes would be taboo.  Joe Darcy has the same opinion.  I would 
restore, but too late now.  I knew I should have got to this email 
earlier.  :)

One question, I haven't tried this out, but will the simple @since 8 
additions clobber all of the existing "Description copied from..." in 
methods like getOrDefault() ?  If so, then we should probably wait until 
that bug is fixed.

Brad





On 12/4/2013 12:32 PM, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
> Ok.. I've removed the formatting changes and updated the webrev in-place.
>
> Tony
>
> On 12/04/2013 11:52 AM, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> Looks ok to me. I'm not really sure if code formatting changes are
>> considered a docs change though, I think this is stretching the
>> definition, so I would probably just make the @since changes.
>>
>> --Sean
>>
>> On 12/04/2013 02:14 PM, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I need a quick review of the below.  The changes reflect comments that
>>> Brad made about javadoc @since tags not being inherited from the new
>>> methods, additionally some formatting changes.  No code changes were
>>> made
>>>
>>> 8029550 javadoc since tag and formatting updates for recent Hashtable
>>> updates
>>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ascarpino/8029550/webrev.00/
>>>
>>> Tony
>>
>