[8] Request for review: 8005939: sun/security/x509/{X509CRLImpl, X509CertImpl}/Verify.java fail in confusing way when some providers not present

[Jason Uh]

Thanks, Sean. For clarification, you're recommending SunJCE for 
verifying both the CRL and the Cert?

On 01/15/2013 07:56 AM, Sean Mullan wrote:
> Hi Jason,nk
>
> This looks good. I also recommending changing this line:
>
>    98             verifyCRL(crlIssuerCertPubKey, "SunPCSC");
>
> to a provider that is always going to exist in one of the smaller
> profiles, but also doesn't have a Signature implementation, for example:
>
>
>    98             verifyCRL(crlIssuerCertPubKey, "SunJCE");
>
> This would allow the test to pass on the compact1/2 profiles.
>
> --Sean
>
> On 01/14/2013 09:05 PM, Jason Uh wrote:
>> (Resending with bug ID in the Subject.)
>>
>> This change allows the tests
>>     sun/security/x509/{X509CRLImpl,X509CertImpl}/Verify.java
>> to fail with a more meaningful message when a provider is not found.
>>
>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~juh/8005939/webrev.00/
>> Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8005939
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jason
>